Categoría: Sin categoría

I. General Principles

This Code of Ethics establishes the principles, standards, and responsibilities governing the receipt, evaluation, review, editing, and publication of works submitted to Espacialidades.

This Code is based on international best practices in editorial ethics, particularly the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA), and the SciELO Network.

The journal is guided by the following principles:

• Scientific integrity: commitment to the truthfulness, accuracy, and soundness of the knowledge produced.
• Intellectual honesty: explicit acknowledgment of sources, ideas, and academic contributions.
• Transparency: clarity in editorial processes and in communication with authors, reviewers, and readers.
• Responsibility: acceptance of the consequences arising from the production, evaluation, and dissemination of knowledge.
• Impartiality: evaluation based exclusively on academic and scientific criteria.
• Confidentiality: protection of information and guarantee of anonymity during the editorial process.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

II. Scope

The provisions of this Code are mandatory for all persons involved in the journal’s editorial process, including:

• authors and co-authors
• members of the Editorial Board
• editor-in-chief and editorial team
• reviewers
• external contributors

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

III. Authors’ Responsibilities

Authors must comply with the following obligations:

1. Originality and unpublished status

Manuscripts submitted for review must be original, unpublished, and not simultaneously under review by another publication. This condition must be verified through the documentation required by the journal.

2. Academic rigor and integrity

Authors are responsible for:

• the accuracy of the data presented
• the methodological integrity of the research
• the logical consistency of the manuscript
• the traceability and verifiability of the results

Any form of fabrication, falsification, manipulation, or concealment of data or results is prohibited.

3. Legitimate Authorship

Authorship should be limited to those who have made substantial contributions to the research and the preparation of the manuscript. The authors must have reviewed and approved the final version submitted for evaluation.

4. Proper use of sources

Authors must:

• correctly cite all sources used
• avoid plagiarism and self-plagiarism
• adhere to the citation system established by the journal
• ensure that citations match the bibliographic references

5. Research Ethics

When the nature of the research requires it, authors must:

• obtain informed consent from participants
• protect their identity and privacy
• comply with applicable national and institutional ethical guidelines

6. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest

Authors must disclose any financial, institutional, professional, academic, or personal conflicts of interest that may influence the content of the research or the editorial process.

7. Correction of Errors

Authors must promptly inform the journal of any significant errors detected in their work before or after publication, and cooperate in the processes of correction, clarification, or retraction when appropriate.

8. Use of Artificial Intelligence

Espacialidades acknowledges that artificial intelligence tools can assist with certain manuscript preparation tasks. Their use must comply with the following criteria:

a) Permitted uses:

• style editing
• linguistic review
• translation
• preliminary organization of ideas
• identification or suggestion of references, provided they are verified by the authors

b) Prohibited uses:

• automated drafting of substantive sections of the manuscript
• generation of analyses, interpretations, or academic conclusions
• Fabrication, alteration, or manipulation of data
• Generation of non-existent or unverified citations or references

Any use of artificial intelligence tools must be explicitly disclosed in the manuscript and in the supplementary documentation required by the journal.

Responsibility for the content rests exclusively with the authors. No artificial intelligence tool may be considered an author or co-author of a manuscript.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

IV. Responsibilities of the Editorial Board and the Editorial Team

The Editorial Board and the editorial team are responsible for preserving the journal’s academic integrity.

Their duties include:

• evaluating the relevance, quality, and scientific rigor of the manuscripts
• ensuring that editorial decisions are based exclusively on academic criteria
• ensuring processes free from discrimination on personal, social, cultural, political, or any other grounds
• overseeing compliance with editorial policies
• ensuring the confidentiality of manuscripts and the review processes
• ensure the proper implementation of the double-blind peer review system
• Identify, investigate, and address potential academic or editorial misconduct
• Issue corrections, clarifications, expressions of concern, or retractions when necessary
• act in accordance with the recommendations and protocols established by COPE

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

V. Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers must:

• accept only evaluations related to their area of expertise
• issue well-reasoned, clear, objective, and respectful reviews
• meet the deadlines established by the journal
• maintain strict confidentiality regarding the content of the manuscripts
• disclose any conflict of interest that could compromise their objectivity
• inform the Editorial Board of any suspected unethical conduct or academic misconduct detected during the review

The following is prohibited:

• using information contained in the manuscripts for personal gain or the benefit of third parties
• sharing or disclosing the evaluated content
• unduly influencing the inclusion of citations or references for personal gain

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

VI. Editorial Process

The editorial process of Espacialidades comprises the following stages:

1. Similarity detection using specialized software.
2. Preliminary editorial review to verify compliance with submission guidelines, anonymization, and the formal quality of the manuscript.
3. Initial evaluation by the Editorial Committee to determine the thematic relevance and academic rigor of the submission.
4. Double-blind peer review, involving at least two external reviewers.
5. Editorial decision.

Editorial decisions may consist of:

• acceptance without changes
• acceptance with minor suggestions
• acceptance conditional on revisions
• rejection

All evaluations will be based on criteria of academic quality, originality, coherence, methodological rigor, and contribution to the field of study.

The entire editorial process must be transparent, documented, and verifiable.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

VII. Academic Integrity, Confidentiality, and Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of Interest

A conflict of interest is considered to be any relationship, circumstance, or connection that may compromise, or appear to compromise, the objectivity, independence, or impartiality of the individuals involved in the editorial process.

All participating parties must promptly disclose any conflict of interest.

Confidentiality

All individuals involved in the editorial process must:

• safeguard the information contained in the manuscripts
• not disclose content, data, or editorial decisions without authorization
• preserve the anonymity inherent in the double-blind review system

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

VIII. Plagiarism and Misconduct

The following constitute serious offenses:

• plagiarism in any form
• self-plagiarism
• fabrication of data
• falsification or manipulation of results
• misappropriation of ideas or academic contributions
• use of materials without the appropriate authorizations
• misuse of artificial intelligence tools
• Omission or concealment of conflicts of interest

Upon detection of any of these behaviors, the journal may take one or more of the following measures:

• Immediate rejection of the manuscript
• suspension or cancellation of the review process
• Temporary or permanent exclusion from future calls for submissions
• Notification to the relevant affiliated institutions
• publication of corrections, clarifications, or retractions
• Any other editorial measures consistent with COPE recommendations

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

IX. Corrections, Retractions, and Expressions of Concern

Espacialidades is committed to the integrity, transparency, and reliability of the academic record. When errors, omissions, or possible irregularities are detected in published works, the journal will act in accordance with the principles established in this Code and the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Corrections

The journal will publish corrections when errors are identified that do not compromise the overall validity of a paper’s results, arguments, or conclusions, but whose rectification is necessary to ensure the accuracy of the academic record.

Corrections may be requested by the authors, by readers, or by the editorial team.

Expressions of Concern

The journal may issue an expression of concern when there are reasonable grounds for suspecting potential ethical or academic misconduct and the corresponding in- y investigation has not been concluded or there is not yet sufficient evidence to reach a definitive decision.

The expression of concern will remain linked to the article until the case is resolved.

Retractions

The journal may retract an article when any of the following situations are confirmed:

• substantial plagiarism or self-plagiarism
• fabrication, falsification, or manipulation of data
• misappropriation of academic ideas or materials
• serious ethical violations in the conduct of research
• concealment of relevant conflicts of interest
• misuse of artificial intelligence tools
• any other conduct that compromises the validity, integrity, or reliability of the published work

Retractions will be made public, will be duly substantiated, and will remain linked to the corresponding article in order to preserve the transparency and integrity of the academic record.

Responsibility of the Authors

Authors must promptly inform the journal of any significant errors detected in their work and cooperate in any necessary correction, clarification, or retraction procedures.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

X. Final Provisions

This Code of Ethics is mandatory for all individuals and entities involved in the editorial processes of Espacialidades.

Ethical disputes will be analyzed and resolved by the Editorial Committee in accordance with the journal’s policies, the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), and the criteria established by the indexes, directories, and academic information systems to which the publication is affiliated.

The journal may request additional information, supplementary documentation, or the intervention of the relevant affiliated institutions when necessary to clarify possible ethical violations.

Non-compliance with the provisions contained in this Code may result in editorial measures, including the rejection of manuscripts, the suspension of review processes, the retraction of publications, or any other action deemed appropriate to safeguard the journal’s academic integrity.

This Code may be updated periodically to incorporate new international recommendations and strengthen Espacialidades’ best editorial practices.

This final clause regarding updates is generally recommended because it allows the Code to be modified in the future without the need to formally justify each change.

Espacialidades, is a biannual electronic publication of the Department of Social Sciences at UAM-C. Its aim is to serve as a forum for academic discussion addressing the complex, contradictory, and multifaceted relationship between space and social life in the contemporary world and across different historical periods.
 
Espacialidades is part of the international academic debate on the spatial turn in the social sciences and invites the analysis of diverse social practices from a multidisciplinary perspective that emphasizes different territorial scales.
 
Our magazine is published twice a year. Two issues are published each year: one during the first half of the year (January–June) and another during the second half of the year (July–December).
 
The texts, digital graphic works, and research updates published incorporate methods and issues addressed from the perspectives of sociology, political science, economics, urban studies, geography, cultural studies, anthropology, and literature.
 
From its founding until 2024, Espacialidades had two sections: Scientific Articles and Reviews. In its new era, it is pleased to add two new sections: Visual Essay and Research Updates and Methodological Notes.
 
The Articles section publishes original, unpublished manuscripts of theoretical, empirical, and applied research on topics as diverse as spatial justice and democracy; globalization, multiculturalism, and identities; gender, the construction of forms of representation and participation; socio-territorial conflicts, governance, the environment, population mobility, regional development, and urban space. The book review section publishes critical analyses of books on the spatial dimensions of social, political, economic, and cultural processes. For its part, the visual essay section seeks to promote the creation of graphic and digital works that explore issues of territoriality from aesthetic, critical, and innovative perspectives. Finally, the section on research updates and methodological notes is designed to disseminate preliminary findings, methodological reflections, and stages of broader research projects that represent significant contributions to the study of spatialities and territories.
 
Espacialidades is a scientific journal of the Department of Social Sciences, part of the Division of Social Sciences and Humanities at the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa Campus. Manuscripts are accepted in Spanish, English, and Portuguese.
 
All submissions will undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process, in accordance with the journal’s editorial guidelines.
The author guidelines for each type of contribution can be found at the bottom of this page. We also recommend reviewing our policies on the use of artificial intelligence and our code of ethics before submitting a manuscript.

Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in the Preparation of Manuscripts

1. General Principles
Spatialities recognizes that artificial intelligence (AI) tools can support the drafting, editing, and organization of academic texts. However, their use must be transparent, limited, and always subject to the supervision and responsibility of the author(s). The use of AI does not replace intellectual authorship and cannot be considered co-authorship under any circumstances. Consequently, the journal will not accept manuscripts whose central ideas, arguments, or conclusions rely substantially on content generated by artificial intelligence technologies.
 
2. Acceptable Use Criteria
 
The use of AI is considered acceptable only for the following tasks:
 
– Linguistic review (grammar, syntax, punctuation).
– Improvement of style and fluency.
– Translation.
– Support in organizing ideas or initial structure.
– Preliminary identification of references (with subsequent verification).
– In all cases, the author is responsible for reviewing, validating, and approving the final result.
 
3. Prohibited Uses
 
It is not permitted to use AI tools to:
 
– Generate entire sections of the manuscript (introduction, discussion, conclusions, etc.).
– Create unverified citations or bibliographic references.
– Produce or alter data, graphs, or images intended for publication.
– Formulate interpretations, hypotheses, or analyses.
– Any misuse will be considered an ethical violation and may result in rejection of the manuscript or editorial sanctions.
 
4. AI Disclosure Statement
 
Any author who has used AI must include a transparency statement at the end of the manuscript, for example:
 
“This manuscript was written by human authors. ‘ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2025)’ was used exclusively for style review and organization of ideas. All interpretations, results, and citations are the result of the authors’ intellectual work.”
 
This statement will be mandatory as of the policy’s publication date.
 
In addition, a letter declaring the use of this technology is required, precisely indicating the locations and processes in which it was employed.
 
5. Table of Uses and Editorial Criteria

Type of Use	Status	Required disclosure format
Stylistic or grammatical correction	✅ Allowed	“AI was used for linguistic review.”
Translation or paraphrasing	✅ Allowed	“AI was used for translation, with subsequent human review.”
Organization of ideas	✅ Allowed	“AI supported the initial structuring of the text.”
Literature search	⚠️ Acceptable with verification	“AI suggested references that were reviewed and confirmed.”
Automated text generation	❌ Not allowed	—
Generation of citations or references	❌ Not allowed	—
Analysis, interpretation, or results	❌ Not allowed	—
Creation of data or graphs	❌ Not allowed	—

6. Final considerations
 
Policies may be updated as the academic use of AI evolves.
Contributions have been sent to:
revista.espacialidades@cua.uam.mx

Cap 1 Espacialidds Jul_Dic 2023 11Dic24Descarga
Responsabilidad social corporativa en el sector minero mexicano. Testimonio de las comunidades afectadas
Verónica Vázquez García, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, México
Esteban Martínez Vásquez, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, México
Fecha de publicación en línea: octubre 2024
http://doi.org/10.24275/esp/2023/02/01
Palabras clave: extractivismo; medio ambiente; salud; educación; agua
Keywords: Extractivism; Environment; Health; Education; Water

Resumen

La responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) busca desarrollar relaciones armoniosas entre empresas y diversos grupos de interés involucrados en sus actividades productivas. El objetivo de este artículo es analizar la política de la RSC de dos de las empresas mineras más importantes de México y el mundo: Newmont Corp. y Grupo México. La metodología combina datos cuantitativos (una encuesta) y cualitativos (entrevistas y talleres), recolectados en localidades aledañas a las minas Peñasquito (Zacatecas) y Buenavista del Cobre (Sonora). El análisis retoma la dimensión económica, social y ambiental para evaluar los alcances de la RSC desde el terreno, dando prioridad a la opinión de las comunidades afectadas y en particular a las mujeres. Los resultados muestran que el principal objetivo de la política de la RSC es prolongar la permanencia de las empresas en el territorio, con el fin de acumular ganancias económicas. Los conceptos de inteligencia estratégica y reciprocidad negativa fueron útiles para demostrar que las afectaciones al medio ambiente y la vida comunitaria son mucho mayores que los beneficios en empleo, educación y salud que ofrecen las empresas.

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) seeks to develop harmonious relationships between companies and the various stakeholders involved in their productive activities. The objective of this paper is to analyze the CSR policy of two of the most important mining enterprises in Mexico and the world: Newmont Corp. and Grupo México. The methodology combined quantitative (a survey) and qualitative (interviews and workshops) data gathered in communities affected by the mines Peñasquito (Zacatecas) and Buenavista del Cobre (Sonora). The analysis considered economic, social, and environmental dimensions to assess the accomplishments of CSR in the terrain, giving priority to the opinions of affected communities, particularly women. Results show that the main objective of CSR policy is to extend the companies’ presence in the territory for the purpose of economic profit. The concepts of strategic intelligence and negative reciprocity were particularly useful to demonstrate that the negative impacts on the environment and community life are much larger than the benefits in employment, education, and health offered by the companies.

Citas

• Arvizu-Armenta, Ernestina y Lorenia Velázquez-Contreras (2019). “Responsabilidad social empresarial: distintivos, prácticas y procesos del sector minero en Sonora, México”, Estudios Sociales. Revista de Alimentación Contemporánea y Desarrollo Regional, vol. 29, núm. 54: 2-30, en <https://doi.org/10.24836/es.v29i54.786>.
• Azamar, Aleida y José Ignacio Ponce (2014). “Extractivismo y desarrollo: los recursos minerales en México”, Revista Problemas del Desarrollo, vol. 45, núm. 179:137-158, en <https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/118/11832064007.pdf>.
• Bakker, Karen J. (2003). “A Political Ecology of Water Privatization”, Studies in Political Economy, vol. 70, núm. 1: 35-58. doi: <https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2003.11827129>.
• Barragán, Almudena (2022). “Plomo en la sangre y pérdidas millonarias, la tragedia del Río Sonora sigue sin resolverse”, en <https://elpais.com/mexico/2022-08-04/plomo-en-la-sangre-y-perdidas-millonarias-la-tragedia-del-rio-sonora-sigue-sin-resolverse.html#:~:text=Fue%20el%20mayor%20desastre%20ambiental,el%20ganado%20de%2022.000%20personas>, consultada el 6 de julio de 2023.
• Bowen, Howard R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, en <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt20q1w8f, en <https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20q1w8f>.
• Burnes Ortiz, Arturo (2010). “Minería y desarrollo regional en Zacatecas: un balance crítico”, en Gian Carlo Delgado-Ramos (coord.), Ecología política de la minería en América Latina. Aspectos socioeconómicos, legales y ambientales de la megaminería. México, unam, pp. 183-211.
• Cabrera Rubio, Anna Luisa (2016). “La responsabilidad social empresarial de grandes multinacionales estadounidenses en México y su adaptación local desde la perspectiva institucional”, Revista de El Colegio de San Luis, vol. 6, núm. 12: 116-158, en <https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rcsl/v6n12/1665-899X-rcsl-6-12-00116.pdf>.
• Cajiga Calderón, Juan Felipe (2011). “El concepto de responsabilidad social empresarial”, Boletín del Centro Mexicano para la Filantropía, en <https://www.cemefi.org/esr/images/stories/pdf/esr/concepto_esr.pdf>, consultada el 6 de marzo de 2023.
• Cámara Minera de México (Camimex) (2023). “Afiliados Camimex”, en <https://camimex.org.mx/index.php/directorio/afiliados>, consultada el 12 de abril de 2023.
• Cámara Minera de México (Camimex) (2022). “Informe anual Camimex 2022”, en <https://camimex.org.mx/application/files/6116/7053/3693/info2022.pdf>, consultada el 14 de enero de 2023.
• Carroll, Archie B. (1979). “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance”, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 4, núm. 4: 497-505, en <https://www.jstor.org/stable/257850>.
• Centro Mexicano para la Filantropía (Cemefi) (2023). “Empresas con distintivo ESR®. Empresas Socialmente Responsables 2023”, en <https://www.cemefi.org/resultadosesr/>, consultada el 7 de marzo de 2023.
• Comités de Cuenca Río Sonora (ccrs) y Proyecto sobre Organización, Desarrollo, Educación e Investigación (poder) (2020). “Cronología de la impunidad”, en <https://poderlatam.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Cronologia_delaImpunidad.pdf>, consultada el 3 de febrero de 2023.
• Cortés Cortés, R. et al. (2019). “Narrativas de despojo y destrucción. La megaminería en México a 30 años del capitalismo neoliberal”, Política y Cultura, núm. 52: 113-139, en <https://doi.org/10.24275/KNYI4842>.
• Díaz-Caravantes, R. E. et al. (2021). “Las plantas potabilizadoras en el Río Sonora: una revisión de la recuperación del desastre”, Región y Sociedad, vol. 33, núm. e1416: 1-25, en <https://doi.org/10.22198/rys2021/33/1416>.
• Garibay Orozco, Claudio (2019). “Clúster minero global: instauración de horizontes de coerción y resistencias en sociedades locales mexicanas”, en Leticia Durand, Anja Nygren y Anne Cristina De la Vega-Leinert (eds.), Naturaleza y neoliberalismo en América Latina. Cuernavaca: Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias (crim), unam, pp. 165-214, en <https://doi.org/10.22201/crim.9786073022231e.2019>.
• Garibay Orozco, Claudio y Alejandra Balzaretti Camacho (2009). “Goldcorp y la reciprocidad negativa en el paisaje minero de Mezcala, Guerrero”, Desacatos, núm. 30: 91-110, en <https://desacatos.ciesas.edu.mx/index.php/Desacatos/article/view/414/289>.
• Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V. (Grupo México) (2023). “Grupo México”, en <https://www.gmexico.com/Pages/default.aspx>, consultada el 12 de abril de 2023.
• Grupo México, S.A.B. de C.V. (Grupo México) (2022). “Informe desarrollo sustentable 2021”, en <https://www.gmexico.com/GMDocs/InformeSustentable/DS2021_ESP.pdf>, consultada el 10 de julio de 2023.
• Ibarra Barreras, María Fernanda (2021). “Derechos socioambientales y actividad minera: el caso del Río Sonora”, en Liz Ileana Rodríguez Gámez y Blanca Esthela Lara Enríquez (eds.), Minería y sociedad en el Río Sonora. Diálogos sobre desarrollo, sostenibilidad e inclusión. Hermosillo: El Colegio de Sonora, pp. 117-133.
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (inegi) (2021). “Censo de población y vivienda 2020”, Subsistema de Información Demográfica y Social, en <https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ccpv/2020/?ps=microdatos>, consultada el 1º de julio de 2023.
• López Pimentel, Édgar (2019). “Nueva crisis de GMéxico ¿y la responsabilidad social?”, El Economista, 23 de julio de 2019, en <https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/opinion/Nueva-crisis-de-GMexico-y-la-responsabilidad-social-20190722-0095.html>, consultada el 12 de abril de 2023.
• Luque Agraz, D. et al. (2019). Río Sonora. El derrame de la mina Buenavista del Cobre-Cananea, 2014. Hermosillo: Ave Editorial.
• Madrigal González, David y Valeria Guarneros Meza (2022). “Responsabilidad social empresarial en la minería de Cananea, Sonora, y Cerro de San Pedro, San Luis Potosí”, Desacatos, núm. 68: 68-85.
• Muñoz Martínez, Hepzibah. (2022). “Minería y política exterior canadiense en México: la agenda de derechos humanos y sobre mujeres en la agenda bilateral”, en María Cecilia Costero Garbarino y Hepzibah Muñoz Martínez (eds.), Minería y mujeres en resistencia: poder, movilizaciones sociales y alternativas de estudio. San Luis Potosí: El Colegio de San Luis, pp. 21-43.
• Newmont Mining Corporation (Newmont Corporation) (2023). “Newmont’s Approach”, en <https://www.newmont.com/sustainability/default.aspx>, consultada el 12 de abril de 2023.
• Ojeda Gutiérrez, D. et al. (2023). “Zacatecas”, en Verónica Vázquez García(coord.), Mujeres frente al extractivismo en México. Experiencias en Zacatecas, Sonora, Chiapas y Puebla. Toluca: Cofradía de Coyotes, pp. 27-42.
• Ornelas Delgado, Jaime (2016). “Sociedades posneoliberales en América Latina y persistencia del extractivismo”, Economía Informa, núm. 396: 84-95, en <http://www.economia.unam.mx/assets/pdfs/econinfo/396/05ornelasdelgadook.pdf>.
• Orozco Martínez, Yuriria y Liz Ileana Rodríguez Gámez (2021). “Riesgos, amenazas y desastres en la minería a cielo abierto y subterránea”, en Liz Ileana Rodríguez Gámez y Blanca Esthela Lara Enríquez (eds.), Minería y sociedad en el Río Sonora. Diálogos sobre desarrollo, sostenibilidad e inclusión. Hermosillo: El Colegio de Sonora, pp. 17-32.
• Outletminero (2023). “Minera Peñasquito, empresa responsable y comprometida”, en <https://outletminero.org/minera-penasquito-empresa-responsable-y-comprometida/>, consultada el 12 de abril de 2023.
• Pacheco-Vega, Raúl (2019). “(Re)theorizing the Politics of Bottled Water: Water Insecurity in the Context of Weak Regulatory Regimes”, Water (Suiza), vol. 11, núm. 4. doi: <https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040658>.
• Pacto Global Red México (2020). “Los diez principios. Pacto Mundial de las Naciones Unidas”, en <https://www.pactomundial.org.mx/diez-principios-del-pacto-mundial/>, consultada el 20 de abril de 2023.
• Rodríguez Gámez, Liz Ileana, Liliana Griselda Almaguer Acosta y María del Carmen Rodríguez López (2021). “Imagen y reputación corporativa en la industria minera de Sonora”, en Liz Ileana Rodríguez Gámez y Blanca Esthela Lara Enríquez (eds.), Minería y sociedad en el Río Sonora. Diálogos sobre desarrollo, sostenibilidad e inclusión. Hermosillo: El Colegio de Sonora, pp. 148-164.
• Romero Barrón, Diego Alberto (2018). “El ejercicio del poder en Mazapil, Zacatecas. Territorio y gobernabilidad transnacional de Peñasquito-Goldcorp”. cdmx: Instituto de Investigaciones “Dr. José María Luis Mora”, tesis de Maestría en Estudios Regionales, en <https://mora.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1018/463>.
• Romo Jiménez, Ana María (2016). “Responsabilidad social empresarial y su evolución en México”. Guadalajara: Quinto Congreso Nacional de Ciencias Sociales, en <http://eprints.uanl.mx/9733/3/RSE.pdf>, consultada el 19 de abril de 2023.
• Santos Cordero, Blanca Ruth y Eleocadio Martínez Silva (2015). “El ‘consentimiento’ negociado entre dos comunidades mineras mexicanas y las trasnacionales Goldcorp y Ternium”, Revista Región y Sociedad, vol. 27, núm. 64: 1-16, en <https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=googlescholar&id=GALE|A604003445&v=2.1&it=r&sid=AONE&asid=ec0b2fc6.
• Santoyo, Johnathan (2023). “Newmont Peñasquito es número uno en gobernanza y medio ambiente según el Dow Jones”, en <https://mineacademy.mx/newmont-penasquto-es-uno/>, consultada el 19 de abril de 2023.
• Santoyo, Johnathan (2021). “Recibe Newmont México reconocimiento por mejores prácticas por cuidado al medio ambiente”, en <https://mineacademy.mx/recibe-newmont-mexico-reconocimiento-por-mejores-practicas-por-cuidado-al-medio-ambiente/>, consultada el 12 de abril de 2023.
• Sariego Rodríguez, Juan Luis (2009). “De minas, mineros, territorios y protestas sociales en México: los nuevos retos de la globalización”, Cahiers des Amériques latines, núms. 60-61: 173-192, en <https://doi.org/10.4000/cal.1435>.
• Scheidel, A. et al. (2023). “Global Impacts of Extractive and Industrial Development Projects on Indigenous Peoples’ Lifeways, Lands, and Rights”, Science Advances, vol. 9, núm. 23. doi: <10.1126/sciadv.ade9557>.
• Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (Sagarpa) (2014). “Inicia entrega de recursos a productores agropecuarios afectados por el derrame en el Río Sonora”, en <https://www.gob.mx/agricultura/prensa/inicia-entrega-de-recursos-a-productores-agropecuarios-afectados-por-el-derrame-en-el-rio-sonora-sagarpa>, consultada el 18 de mayo de 2023.
• Toscana Aparicio, Alejandra y Pedro de Jesús Hernández Canales (2017). “Gestión de riesgos y desastres socioambientales. El caso de la mina Buenavista del Cobre de Cananea”, Investigaciones Geográficas, núm. 93: 126-139, en <https://doi.org/10.14350/rig.54770>.
• Ulloa, Astrid (2016). “Feminismos territoriales en América Latina: defensas de la vida frente a los extractivismos”, Nómadas, núm. 45: 124-139, en <https://doi.org/10.30578/nomadas. n45a8>.
• Uribe Sierra, Sergio Elías y Alejandra Toscana Aparicio (2022). “Boom minero y conflictividad en el noreste de Zacatecas, México”, en Hugo Pereira, Eraldo da Silva Ramos Filho y Angelina Herrera (coords.), Defensa del territorio, la cultura y la vida ante el avance extractivista: una perspectiva desde América Latina. Buenos Aires: Clacso/ceri, pp. 113-128, en <https://www.clacso.org/defensa-del-territorio-la-cultura-y-la-vida-ante-el-avance-extractivista/.
• Vázquez-García, Verónica (2021). “Género, desastres ambientales y consumo de agua embotellada. El caso de la cuenca del Río Sonora”, Región y Sociedad, vol. 33, núm. e1473: 1-22, en <https://doi.org/10.22198/rys2021/33/1473>.
• Vázquez García, V. et al. (2023). “Desplazamiento poblacional por minería en Mazapil, Zacatecas. Un análisis desde la perspectiva de género”, Península, vol. 18, núm. 1: 35-59, en <https://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/peninsula/article/view/84256>.
• Vázquez García, V. et al. (2020). “Desastres ambientales y derecho humano al agua. Un análisis de género del derrame de lixiviados de cobre en el Río Sonora”, Cuadernos Territorio y Desarrollo Local, vol. 3, núm. 10: 15-28.
• Velázquez, Érika (2022). “Derrame en el Río Sonora: un hospital abandonado”. Expreso, en <https://www.expreso.com.mx/noticias/sonora/derrame-rio-sonora-hospital-en-abandono/157699>, consultada el 10 de julio de 2023.
• Vélez Evans, Ana María (2011). “Un recorrido hacia la responsabilidad social corporativa”., Revista Ciencias Estratégicas, vol. 19, núm. 25: 55-74, en <https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1513/151322413004.pdf>.
• Villafán Vidales, Katia Beatriz (2020). “Evolución conceptual de la responsabilidad social”, Revista de la Facultad de Contaduría y Ciencias Administrativas, vol. 5, núm. 10: 69-80, en <https://rfcca.umich.mx/index.php/rfcca/article/download/145/127/.
• Vintró Sánchez, Carla y Josep Comajuncosa Casabella (2009). “La responsabilidad social corporativa en la minería”. Santiago de Compostela: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Minería sostenible: conferencia internacional, 09: 835-849, en <http://hdl.handle.net/2117/6975>.

Cómo citar

Autores: Verónica Vázquez García y Esteban Martínez Vásquez

Título: Responsabilidad social corporativa en el sector minero mexicano. Testimonio de las comunidades afectadas

Título de la revista: Espacialidades

INSS 2007-560X

Volumen: 13

Número: 02

Año: 2023

Fecha de publicación: octubre 2024

DOI: http://doi.org/10.24275/esp/2023/02/01

URL: https://espacialidades.cua.uam.mx/index.php/vol-1/

Publicado por: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Cuajimalpa

Publicación semestral